|
<The
"common mind" discussed in this dialogue is the same Mind
which appears as a divine power in other parts of the Hermetic
literature. It is identical, as well, with the "Good Daimon"
whose words are quoted at several points here and elsewhere. <The
Greek word logos - which means both "word" and
"reason", among other things - is central to much of the
argument, and it's unfortunate that English has no way to express
the same complex of meanings. The praise of reason in parts 13-14 is
also, and equally, a praise of human language, and this sort of
double meaning plays a part elsewhere in this and other parts of the
Hermetic literature. - JMG>
1.
Hermes: The Mind, O Tat, is of God's very essence - (if such a thing
as essence of God there be) - and what that is, it and it only knows
precisely. The Mind, then, is not separated off from God's
essentiality, but is united to it, as light to sun. This Mind in men
is God, and for this cause some of mankind are gods, and their
humanity is nigh unto divinity. For the Good Daimon said: "Gods
are immortal men, and men are mortal gods."
2.
But in irrational lives Mind is their nature. For where is Soul,
there too is Mind; just as where Life, there is there also Soul. But
in irrational lives their soul is life devoid of mind; for Mind is
the in-worker of the souls of men for good - He works on them for
their own good. In lives irrational He doth co-operate with each
one's nature; but in the souls of men He counteracteth them. For
every soul, when it becomes embodied, is instantly depraved by
pleasure and by pain. For in a compound body, just like juices, pain
and pleasure seethe, and into them the soul, on entering in, is
plunged.
3.
O'er whatsoever souls the Mind doth, then, preside, to these it
showeth its own light, by acting counter to their prepossessions,
just as a good physician doth upon the body prepossessed by
sickness, pain inflict, burning or lancing it for sake of health. In
just the selfsame way the Mind inflicteth pain on the soul, to
rescue it from pleasure, whence comes its every ill. The great ill
of the soul is godlessness; then followeth fancy for all evil things
and nothing good. So, then, Mind counteracting it doth work good on
the soul, as the physician health upon the body.
4.
But whatsoever human souls have not the Mind as pilot, they share in
the same fate as souls of lives irrational. For [Mind] becomes
co-worker with them, giving full play to the desires toward which
[such souls] are borne - [desires] that from the rush of lust strain
after the irrational; [so that such human souls,] just like
irrational animals, cease not irrationally to rage and lust, nor are
they ever satiate of ills. For passions and irrational desires are
ills exceeding great; and over these God hath set up the Mind to
play the part of judge and executioner.
5.
Tat: In that case, father mine, the teaching (logos) as to Fate,
which previously thou didst explain to me, risks to be overset. For
that if it be absolutely fated for a man to fornicate, or commit
sacrilege, or do some other evil deed, why is he punished - when he
hath done the deed from Fate's necessity? Hermes: All works, my son,
are Fate's; and without Fate naught of things corporal - or
<i.e., either> good, or ill - can come to pass. But it is
fated, too, that he who doeth ill, shall suffer. And for this cause
he doth it - that he may suffer what he suffereth, because he did
it.
6.
But for the moment, [Tat,] let be the teaching as to vice and Fate,
for we have spoken of these things in other [of our sermons]; but
now our teaching (logos) is about the Mind: - what Mind can do, and
how it is [so] different - in men being such and such, and in
irrational lives [so] changed; and [then] again that in irrational
lives it is not of a beneficial nature, while that in men it
quencheth out the wrathful and the lustful elements. Of men, again,
we must class some as led by reason, and others as unreasoning.
7.
But all men are subject to Fate, and genesis and change, for these
are the beginning and the end of Fate. And though all men do suffer
fated things, those led by reason (those whom we said Mind doth
guide) do not endure <a> like suffering with the rest; but,
since they've freed themselves from viciousness, not being bad, they
do not suffer bad. Tat: How meanest thou again, my father? Is not
the fornicator bad; the murderer bad; and [so with] all the rest?
Hermes: [I meant not that;] but that the Mind-led man, my son,
though not a fornicator, will suffer just as though he had committed
fornication, and though he be no murderer, as though he had
committed murder. The quality of change he can no more escape than
that of genesis. But it is possible for one who hath the Mind, to
free himself from vice.
8.
Wherefore I've ever heard, my son, Good Daimon also say - (and had
He set it down in written words, He would have greatly helped the
race of men; for He alone, my son, doth truly, as the Firstborn God,
gazing on all things, give voice to words (logoi) divine) - yea,
once I heard Him say: "All things are one, and most of all the
bodies which the mind alone perceives. Our life is owing to [God's]
Energy and Power and Aeon. His Mind is good, so is His Soul as well.
And this being so, intelligible things know naught of separation.
So, then, Mind, being Ruler of all things, and being Soul of God,
can do whate'er it wills."
9. So
do thou understand, and carry back this word (logos) unto the
question thou didst ask before - I mean about Mind's Fate. For if
thou dost with accuracy, son, eliminate [all] captious arguments (logoi),
thou wilt discover that of very truth the Mind, the Soul of God,
doth rule o'er all - o'er Fate, and Law, and all things else; and
nothing is impossible to it - neither o'er Fate to set a human soul,
nor under Fate to set [a soul] neglectful of what comes to pass. Let
this so far suffice from the Good Daimon's most good [words]. Tat:
Yea, [words] divinely spoken, father mine, truly and helpfully. But
further still explain me this.
10.
Thou said'st that Mind in lives irrational worked in them as [their]
nature, co-working with their impulses. But impulses of lives
irrational, as I do think, are passions. Now if the Mind co-worketh
with [these] impulses, and if the impulses of [lives] irrational be
passions, then is Mind also passion, taking its color from the
passions. Hermes: Well put, my son! Thou questionest right nobly,
and it is just that I as well should answer [nobly].
11.
All things incorporeal when in a body are subject unto passion, and
in the proper sense they are [themselves] all passions. For every
thing that moves itself is incorporeal; while every thing that's
moved is body. Incorporeals are further moved by Mind, and
movement's <i.e., movement is> passion. Both, then, are
subject unto passion - both mover and the moved, the former being
ruler and the latter ruled. But when a man hath freed himself from
body, then is he also freed from passion. But, more precisely, son,
naught is impassible, but all are passible. Yet passion differeth
from passibility; for that the one is active, while the other's
passive. Incorporeals moreover act upon themselves, for either they
are motionless or they are moved; but whichsoe'er it be, it's
passion. But bodies are invaribly acted on, and therefore they are
passible. Do not, then, let terms trouble thee; action and passion
are both the selfsame thing. To use the fairer sounding term,
however, does no harm.
12.
Tat: Most clearly hast thou, father mine, set forth the teaching
(logos). Hermes: Consider this as well, my son; that these two
things God hath bestowed on man beyond all mortal lives - both mind
and speech (logos) equal to immortality. He hath the mind for
knowing God and uttered speech (logos) for eulogy of Him. And if one
useth these for what he ought, he'll differ not a whit from the
immortals. Nay, rather, on departing from the body, he will be
guided by the twain unto the Choir of Gods and Blessed Ones.
13.
Tat: Why, father mine! - do not the other lives make use of speech
(logos)? Hermes: Nay, son; but <i.e., only> use of voice;
speech is far different from voice. For speech is general among all
men, while voice doth differ in each class of living thing. Tat: But
with men also, father mine, according to each race, speech differs.
Hermes: Yea, son, but man is one; so also speech is one and is
interpreted, and it is found the same in Egypt, and in Persia, and
in Greece. Thou seemest, son, to be in ignorance of Reason's (Logos)
worth and greatness. For that the Blessed God, Good Daimon, hath
declared: "Soul is in Body, Mind in Soul; but Reason (Logos) is
in Mind, and Mind in God; and God is Father of [all] these."
14.
The Reason, then, is the Mind's image, and Mind God's [image]; while
Body is [the image] of the Form; and Form [the image] of the Soul.
The subtlest part of Matter is, then, Air <or vital spirit>;
of Air, Soul; of Soul, Mind; and of Mind, God. And God surroundeth
all and permeateth all; while Mind Surroundeth Soul, Soul Air, Air
Matter. Necessity and Providence and Nature are instruments of
Cosmos and of Matter's ordering; while of intelligible things each
is Essence, and Sameness is their Essence. But of the bodies of the
Cosmos each is many; for through possessiong Sameness, [these]
composed bodies, though they do change from one into another of
themselves, do natheless keep the incorruption of their Sameness.
15.
Whereas in all the rest of composed bodies, of each there is a
certain number; for without number structure cannot be, or
composition, or decomposition. Now it is units that give birth to
number and increase it, and, being decomposed, are taken back again
into themselves. Matter is one; and this whole Cosmos - the mighty
God and image of the mightier One, both with Him unified, and the
conserver of the Will and Order of the Father - is filled full of
Life. Naught is there in it throughout the whole of Aeon, the
Father's [everlasting] Re-establishment - nor of the whole, nor of
the parts - which doth not live. For not a single thing that's dead,
hath been, or is, or shall be in [this] Cosmos. For that the Father
willed it should have Life as long as it should be. Wherefore it
needs must be a God.
16.
How then, O son, could there be in the God, the image of the Father,
in the plenitude of Life - dead things? For that death is
corruption, and corruption destruction. How then could any part of
that which knoweth no corruption be corrupted, or any whit of him
the God destroyed? Tat: Do they not, then, my father, die - the
lives in it, that are its parts? Hermes: Hush, son! - led into error
by the term in use for what takes place. They do not die, my son,
but are dissolved as compound bodies. Now dissolution is not death,
but dissolution of a compound; it is dissolved not so that it may be
destroyed, but that it may become renewed. For what is the activity
of life? Is it not motion? What then in Cosmos is there that hath no
motion? Naught is there, son!
17.
Tat: Doth not Earth even, father, seem to thee to have no motion?
Hermes: Nay, son; but rather that she is the only thing which,
though in very rapid motion, is also stable. For how would it not be
a thing to laugh at, that the Nurse of all should have no motion,
when she engenders and brings forth all things? For 'tis impossible
that without motion one who doth engender, should do so. That thou
should ask if the fourth part <or element> is not inert, is
most ridiculous; for the body which doth have no motion, gives sign
of nothing but inertia.
18.
Know, therefore, generally, my son, that all that is in Cosmos is
being moved for increase or for decrease. Now that which is kept
moving, also lives; but there is no necessity that that which lives,
should be all same. For being simultaneous, the Cosmos, as a whole,
is not subject to change, my son, but all its parts are subject unto
it; yet naught [of it] is subject to corruption, or destroyed. It is
the terms employed that confuse men. For 'tis not genesis that
constituteth life, but 'tis sensation; it is not change that
constituteth death, but 'tis forgetfulness. Since, then, these
things are so, they are immortal all - Matter, [and] Life, [and]
Spirit, Mind [and] Soul, of which whatever liveth, is composed.
19.
Whatever then doth live, oweth its immortality unto the Mind, and
most of all doth man, he who is both recipient of God, and
co-essential with Him. For with this life alone doth God consort; by
visions in the night, by tokens in the day, and by all things doth
He foretell the future unto him - by birds, by inward parts, by
wind, by tree. Wherefore doth man lay claim to know things past,
things present and to come.
20.
Observe this too, my son; that each one of the other lives
inhabiteth one portion of the Cosmos - aquatic creatures water,
terrene earth, and aery creatures air; while man doth use all these
- earth, water air [and] fire; he seeth Heaven, too, and doth
contact it with [his] sense. But God surroundeth all, and permeateth
all, for He is energy and power; and it is nothing difficult, my
son, to conceive God.
21.
But if thou wouldst Him also contemplate, behold the ordering of the
Cosmos, and [see] the orderly behavior of its ordering <this is a
play on the word "cosmos", which means "order,
arrangement">; behold thou the Necessity of things made
manifest, and [see] the Providence of things become and things
becoming; behold how Matter is all-full of Life; [behold] this so
great God in movement, with all the good and noble [ones] - gods,
daimones and men! Tat: But these are purely energies, O father mine!
Hermes: If, then, they're purely energies, my son - by whom, then,
are they energized except by God? Or art thou ignorant, that just as
Heaven, Earth, Water, Air, are parts of Cosmos, in just the selfsame
way God's parts are Life and Immortality, [and] Energy, and Spirit,
and Necessity, and Providence, and Nature, Soul, and Mind, and the
Duration <that is, Aeon or Eternity> of all these that is
called Good? And there are naught of things that have become, or are
becoming, in which God is not.
22.
Tat: Is He in Matter, father, then? Hermes: Matter, my son, is
separate from God, in order that thou may'st attribute to it the
quality of space. But what thing else than mass think'st thou it is,
if it's not energized? Whereas if it be energized, by whom is it
made so? For energies, we said, are parts of God. By whom are, then,
all lives enlivened? By whom are things immortal made immortal? By
whom changed things made changeable? And whether thou dost speak of
Matter, of Body, or of Essence, know that these too are energies of
God; and that materiality is Matter's energy, that corporeality is
Bodies' energy, and that essentiality doth constituteth the energy
of Essence; and this is God - the All.
23.
And in the All is naught that is not God. Wherefore nor <i.e.,
neither> size, nor space, nor quality, nor form, nor time,
surroundeth God; for He is All, and All surroundeth all, and
permeateth all. Unto this Reason (Logos), son, thy adoration and thy
worship pay. There is one way alone to worship God; [it is] not to
be bad.
|